A GO reimplement of UOJ judger

Reimplement of UOJ run program in GO: go-judger. Start after I found libseccomp that uses seccomp filter introduced in linux 3.8 (2013). Since I have participated that project (uoj) only a little, I decided to try to do some contributions.

Original implements

The original run program restricted resources (CPU, memory, output) and file access by ptrace. Including following steps:

Setup up step after fork in child:

1. Set resource limits by setrlimit
2. Set environment variables
3. Set input / output files
4. execv

Tracing after fork in parent:

Setup ptrace options when trapped at execv

1. wait4 at syscall entrance
2. Check resource usage, wait status, signals and syscall black list to determine terminate or soft ban
3. ptrace syscall enter syscall
4. wait4 at syscall exits
5. Set syscall return value
6. ptrace syscall exit syscall

In this scenario, the traced process required to stop for each syscall and for both entrance and exiting. For harmless syscalls (e.g. brk, read), this introduces some resource overhead.

Reimplements

For the newly implemented seccomp BPF filter provided by libseccomp, this kind of syscall will handled by the kernel to avoid too much context switch. Also, for a single traced syscall, seccomp will only be triggered once.

Thus, the new implement becomes.

Setup step after fork in child:

1. Set resource limits by setrlimit
2. Set input / output files
3. Load seccomp filter
4. Stop itself by SIGSTOP
5. execve with environment variables

Tracing after fork in parent:

Setup ptrace options when trapped by SIGSTOP

1. wait4 at seccomp event
2. Check resource usage, wait status, signals, and call syscall event handles. Handle determins whether to terminates or soft ban
3. ptrace continue enter syscall

Notice that SIGSTOP before execve is required since if execve is traced but the ptrace option have not set up yet, ENOSYS will returned to execve. Safe syscalls was allowed by the filter so there is no ptrace event triggered by safe syscalls.

Also, by setting syscall number to -1 and return value to the register, the soft ban mechanism becomes much efficient.

With all that implemented, process_vm_readv is used to speed up copy syscall argument instead of ptrace peekdata.

Conclusion

In conclusion, by restrict CPU time, memory, output, syscalls and file access, run program is able to block potential attacks.

Since GO language does not provides official implements for fork for runtime duplication issue, it took some time to figure out the usage of raw syscall interface. Because after fork in child, I cannot call any go function, I did buffed the seccomp filter to allow load it after fork. Also, process_vm_readv is not provided so I wrote a wrapper for it.